Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Hill

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 3, 1952No. 89PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, J.:

The plaintiff brings this action for declaratory judgment as a citizen-taxpayer and as a member of the Board of Education of the Lewes Special School District. In his complaint, the plaintiff asserts that each of the defendants is usurping the office of member of the said Board of Education and that each of them is exercising such office without legal right. The defendants deny the assertion and, by counterclaim filed by them as citizen-taxpayers and members of the said Board of Education, they in turn charge the plaintiff with usurpation and unlawful exercise of office on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  3. Stabler v. RamsaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Buckingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1944
  5. McGee v. DunniganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Schick Inc. v. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers UnionCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  2. Rollins International, Inc. v. International Hydronics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. McKenna v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  4. Gordy v. Preform Building Components, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API