Legal Opinion

Buckingham v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 20, 1944PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This case in the final analysis depends entirely upon the applicability and validity of the Act of Assembly quoted in the statement of facts. It is conceded that Buckingham, at the time of his election as Mayor of Middletown, had every qualification as required by the Charter of the Town, and that his election was valid, unless, under the quoted Act of Assembly, he was ineligible to be a candidate for the office of Mayor of Middletown by reason of the fact that he was, at the time, a Justice of the Peace.

It has been suggested that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People ex rel. Hoyne v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Jansky v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Chandler v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Holley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API