Legal Opinion
McGee v. Dunnigan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 17, 1951PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment. Their claims are numerous but basically they ask a determination of the right of the Bridgeport board of education to expend the state subsidy for education in addition to the amount appropriated for education by die board of finance from the city’s general funds. The brief finding is not attacked but the defendants seek to supplement it by the addition of thirty-six paragraphs of their counterfinding. No additions to the finding are necessary to present the decisive issue on appeal.
The three plaintiffs are residents, voters, taxpayers and members…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Sigal v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Chilcutt v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Park City Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Steeneck v. University of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Kelman v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.