Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 17, 1911No. 1PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Writ of Error, to Superior Court for New Castle County.—No. 108, June Term, 1908 below. Information in the nature of a Writ of Quo Warranto. The facts of the case and specifications of the assignments of error fully appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Woolley, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

On or about the twenty-eighth day of October, A. D. 1901, Henry Brooks, Richard B. Morrell and William M. Pyle organized a corporation under the general corporation laws of the State of Delaware, for the purpose of conducting and carrying on the textile business in which Brooks and Morrell had been previously engaged in the State of Pennsylvania. Before entering upon its business, the corporation, which was known as Geo. Brooks and Son Company, issued $300,000 of its capital stock, of the share value of $100 each, $100,000 of which was preferred…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Shutte v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Oregonian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Holyoke Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Person v. . GrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Oberly v. KirbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. Gentry-Futch Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. Gaskill v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API