Legal Opinion
Schick Inc. v. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided September 16, 1987No. Civ. A. 9066PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEN, Chancellor.
The innovative complaint in this declaratory judgment action has been challenged as failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. I pass immediately therefore to a description of the facts as alleged in that pleading.
I
Plaintiff (“Schick” or “the Company”) is a Delaware corporation that owns a diversified group of subsidiaries including Reeves Brothers, Inc. Reeves, which was acquired by Schick in May 1986, operates two polyurethane foam manufacturing plants in Cornelius, North Carolina.
Defendant Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union (“ACTWU” or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- duPont v. WylyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Stroud v. Milliken Entersprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- XL Specialty Insurance v. WMI Liquidating TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
- Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.