Legal Opinion

Peck v. Noee

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1908No. Sac. No. 1627PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. J. D. Goodwin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone. The action is by the plaintiff for himself and as assignee of twenty-seven other persons against the appellants as stockholders of the Hathaway Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Nevada and doing business in California, to enforce their alleged liability, as such stockholders, to the plaintiff as a creditor of the corporation. The only question presented for consideration on the merits of the case is whether or not the stockholders of a corporation organized in Nevada are individually…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API