Legal Opinion
Kaintz v. PLG, INC.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 15, 2008No. 61333-2-IPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
197 P.3d 710 (2008)
Timothy J. KAINTZ and Kerri Kaintz, Husband and Wife, and their Marital Community, and Kelmark, LLC, Respondents,
v.
PLG, INC., a Washington corporation, Appellant.
No. 61333-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
December 15, 2008.
Darren Anthony Feider, Daniel W. Ferm, Williams Kastner & Gibbs PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
George Alfred Purdy, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
¶ DWYER, A.C.J.
¶ 1 Mutuality of remedy is an equitable principle, recognized in the case law of Washington, that can support the award of attorney fees to the prevailing party in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Tradewell Group, Inc. v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Washington State Communication Access Project v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Renfro v. KaurCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Excelsior Mortgage Equity Fund II, LLC v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.