Legal Opinion
Washington State Communication Access Project v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 28, 2013No. 67613-0-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 — Regal Cinemas Inc., Cinemark Holdings Inc., and American Multi-Cinema Inc. (AMC) appeal decisions of the trial court in this action under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), chapter 49.60 RCW. They contend that the Washington State Communication Access Project (WashCAP), a nonprofit corporation and the successful plaintiff, is not entitled to the declaratory, injunctive, and attorney fee relief awarded below. We disagree and affirm.1
¶2 WashCAP has the stated purpose “to enable those with hearing losses to enjoy public places and participate in *183public life as fully as those…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. SlattumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Miller v. Monroe School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Stacia Hartleben v. University Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.