Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
In this case we consider whether there was consideration for the formation of a valid noncompete agreement signed by an employee, five years after he was hired, when the employer offered no other additional benefits or promises to the employee. Anthony Labriola (Employee) seeks a declaration that an agreement not to compete is null and void against Pollard Group, Inc. (Employer), his former employer. A noncompete agreement entered into after employment has commenced is validly formed only when there is independent consideration at the time the agreement is reached. Finding that there was no *831in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hogland v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Marriage of SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 2011
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.