Legal Opinion

Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2004No. 74002-0PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

In this case we consider whether there was consideration for the formation of a valid noncompete agreement signed by an employee, five years after he was hired, when the employer offered no other additional benefits or promises to the employee. Anthony Labriola (Employee) seeks a declaration that an agreement not to compete is null and void against Pollard Group, Inc. (Employer), his former employer. A noncompete agreement entered into after employment has commenced is validly formed only when there is independent consideration at the time the agreement is reached. Finding that there was no *831in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hogland v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re the Marriage of SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 2011

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API