Alexander v. Blackhawk Recovery & Investigation, L.L.C.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Tommy Alexander, brings this action pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., alleging that defendant, Blackhawk Recovery and Investigation, LLC (Blackhawk), violated the FDCPA in its attempts to repossess a 2006 Chevrolet Trail Blazer from Alexander. Additionally, Alexander brings a state law claim under the Michigan Occupational Code, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 339.901 et seq. On June 3, 2010, Blackhawk filed a motion for summary judgment 1…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gable v. Universal Acceptance Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- Vantu v. Echo Recovery, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Carr v. Collateral Recovery & Investigation, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- David Miedel v. North Star Recovery, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Drahos v. U.S. Bank National AssocationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.