Legal Opinion

Vantu v. Echo Recovery, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 12, 2015No. Case No. 3:14CV958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR SR., District Judge.

This case arises out of a defaulted auto loan and a botched attempt at repossessing the vehicle securing the loan.

Plaintiff Wanda Yantu alleges that defendant Ronald Maddox threatened her at gunpoint while trying to repossess a van that belonged to Vantu’s ex-husband. Vantu brings claims against Maddox and the company — defendant Echo Recovery— that engaged Maddox to repossess the van under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and Ohio law.

Pending is Echo’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Boykin v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drahos v. U.S. Bank National AssocationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. Pritchard v. FTM, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Shue v. JMAC Distribution, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API