Eastman v. Stanley Works
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sadler, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, The Stanley Works, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, entered upon a jury verdict finding appellant liable on the claims of plaintiff-appellee, Shawn L. Eastman, for strict product liability and negligence.
{¶ 2} Appellant manufactures tools, including the tool subject of this case, the Stanley Fat Max 22 hammer (“FM22”). Appellee is a framing carpenter who was injured on April 23, 2004, when one of the claws of his FM22 broke off, flew into his left eye, and ruptured his left eyeball. Appellee’s injuries resulted in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Roberts v. RMB Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cameron v. Univ. of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Miller v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- McLaughlin v. Andy's Coin Laundries, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.