Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
Appellant’s complaint demanded that she be entitled to participate in the Workers’ Compensation Fund and receive death benefits due to her husband’s death. We have stated that in order for dependents of deceased workers to participate in the Workers’ Compensation Fund and collect death benefits, “ * * * the proof offered must show such injury was a proximate cause of death * * *.” Aiken v. Indus. Comm. (1944), 143 Ohio St. 113, 28 O.O. 50, 53 N.E.2d 1018, at the syllabus. Moreover, we have adhered to the proposition that when “ * * * considering the issue of proximate cause in the workers’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riley v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Feterle v. HuettnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Norris v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by260 opinions
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns Football Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.