Legal Opinion
Newman Signs, Inc. v. Hjelle
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1978No. Civ. 9394PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Justice.
This appeal involves the interpretation of the Federal “Highway Beautification Act of 1965,” 23 U.S.C. § 131, and the North Dakota Highway Beautification Act, Chapter 24-17, North Dakota Century Code. There were three actions in the district court, two commenced by Newman Signs, Inc. (hereinafter Newman), and one by Walter R. Hjelle, as North Dakota State Highway Commissioner (hereinafter Commissioner). The North Dakota Highway Corridor Board (hereinafter Board) was a defendant in an action brought by Newman. By agreement, the three actions were consolidated into one, in which…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- John Donnelly & Sons v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- City of Lakewood v. Colfax Unlimited Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Nygaard v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.