Prostar Wireless Grp., LLC v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
William H. Orrick, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Prostar Wireless Group, LLC ("Prostar") seeks to hold Domino's Pizza1 ("Domino's") accountable for the years of work it spent developing a custom GPS driver tracking system ("the Solution") for Domino's franchisees. Prostar argues that despite a lengthy collaboration, Domino's refused to honor its side of the deal and allow Prostar to sell the finished Solution to franchisees. Instead, it relied on Prostar's work to develop an in-house system. Before me is Domino's motion for summary judgment on all ten causes of action. For…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. WynneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Auris Health, Inc. v. Noah Medical CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Beluca Ventures LLC v. Einride AktiebolagDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Nevro Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Broidy Capital Management LLC v. MuzinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.