State Highway Commission v. Rowson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
It is a settled principle of law in this State that a consent judgment is the contract of the parties entered upon the records of a court of competent jurisdiction with its sanction and approval. King v. King, 225 N.C. 639, 35 S.E. 2d 893; Keen v. Parker, 217 N.C. 378, 3 S.E. 2d 209. “Moreover, the power of a court to sign a consent judgment depends upon the unqualified consent of the parties thereto, King v. King, supra, and ‘the consent of the parties must still subsist at the time the court is called upon to exercise its juris diction and sign the consent judgment.’ ” Lee v. Rhodes, 227…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. BounousCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- R. E. Uptegraff Manufacturing Co. v. International Union of Electrical Radio & Machine WorkersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Brundage v. FoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Freedle v. MoorefieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.