Lee v. . Rhodes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The conduct of the plaintiff, if considered in its most favorable light, does not appeal to the conscience of the Court. Even so, the record presents for our consideration and determination a question of law rather than one of ethics.
The appellants are relying upon the decisions of this Court in which it has been held that the requirement that a judgment should be signed by the judge is only directory; and that when a judgment is passed in open court and filed with the papers as a part of the judgment roll, it is a valid judgment, Range Co. v. Carver, 118 N. C., 328, 24 S. E., 352. McDonald…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Rollins v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keener v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Harbour v. Brown for UlrichTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Van Donselaar v. Van DonselaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Few v. Hammack Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Ledford v. . LedfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.