Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Bounous
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Appellant argues that Judge Noble erred by failing to conduct an independent hearing to ascertain the existence of actual consent on the part of all parties to the consent judgment, and that Judge Crotty in turn erred by failing to grant relief under Rule 60 based upon the lack of such investigatory hearing. The argument is meritless.
Judge Noble was presented with a document purporting to be a negotiated settlement of the parties’ lawsuit. It was signed by all parties. The evidence before Judge Crotty was that the only person present when Judge Noble signed the judgment was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Owens v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State Highway Commission v. RowsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- BLACK HORSE RUN PROP. OWNERS ASSOCIATION-RALEIGH, INC. v. KaleelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Workman v. Rutherford Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- McGee v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Torain v. Fordham Drug Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Garlock v. Wake County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.