Brundage v. Foye
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
.JOHN, Judge.
Defendant Robert Foye (Robert) appeals the trial court’s failure to set aside a consent judgment and the court’s refusal to grant his attorney’s motion to withdraw from the action. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse the decision of the trial court.
*139Relevant procedural information is as follows: On 26 August 1991 Flora and James Brundage (plaintiffs) initiated suit against Robert and Wilma Foye (defendants) for breach of contract alleging that defendants failed to convey a lot to plaintiffs in violation of their prior agreement. Defendants answered 25 October 1991…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Thrift v. Buncombe County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Brundage v. FoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- In the Matter of JmbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.