Legal Opinion

Brundage v. Foye

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1995No. 9311SC620PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.JOHN, Judge.

Defendant Robert Foye (Robert) appeals the trial court’s failure to set aside a consent judgment and the court’s refusal to grant his attorney’s motion to withdraw from the action. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse the decision of the trial court.

*139Relevant procedural information is as follows: On 26 August 1991 Flora and James Brundage (plaintiffs) initiated suit against Robert and Wilma Foye (defendants) for breach of contract alleging that defendants failed to convey a lot to plaintiffs in violation of their prior agreement. Defendants answered 25 October 1991…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Thrift v. Buncombe County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Brundage v. FoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. In the Matter of JmbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API