Legal Opinion

Cox v. Cox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 783DC1057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

We hold the district court committed error in amending the consent judgment. There have been many cases in this state dealing with the setting aside or amendment of consent judgments. See Holsomback v. Holsomback, 273 N.C. 728, 161 S.E. 2d 99 (1968); Cranford v. Steed, 268 N.C. 595, 151 S.E. 2d 206 (1966); Becker v. Becker, 262 N.C. 685, 138 S.E. 2d 507 (1964); Overton v. Overton, 259 N.C. 31, 129 S.E. 2d 593 (1963); King v. King, 225 N.C. 639, 35 S.E. 2d 893 (1945); Hazard v. Hazard, 35 N.C. App. 668, 242 S.E. 2d 196 (1978); Blankenship v. Price, 27 N.C. App. 20, 217 S.E. 2d 709…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Holsomback v. HolsombackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State Highway Commission v. RowsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Rockwell v. RockwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API