Matherly v. State

The first error assigned by defendant is that the conrt erred in refusing toj sustain the motion to quash the panel of jurors drawn in Creek county for the January, 1936, term of court.

It is contended: (a) That the jury list was not selected with regard to the voting strength of the several townships, (b) The jury commissioners failed to certify the voting precincts of the jurors drawn by them. No proof was offered to sustain the first proposition and defendant in his brief cites no1 authorities. The certificate of the jury commissioners recites:

“ * * * Each being and possessing the…