Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. L. A. 17829PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

— This is an action for declaratory relief in which plaintiffs sought a construction of section 125(b) of the Los Angeles City Charter. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered against them in the trial court,

*401In support of the trial court’s judgment in their favor, defendants contend that an action for declaratory relief is not available against a municipal corporation in this state. For this proposition they rely upon the recent cases of Bayshore San. Dist. v. San Mateo County, 48 Cal.App.2d 337 [119 P.2d 752], and Irvine v. Sacramento, etc. Drainage Dist. 49 Cal.App.2d 707 [122 P.2d 320].…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Georgia v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. WD Haden Company v. DodgenTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API