Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
— This is an action for declaratory relief in which plaintiffs sought a construction of section 125(b) of the Los Angeles City Charter. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered against them in the trial court,
*401In support of the trial court’s judgment in their favor, defendants contend that an action for declaratory relief is not available against a municipal corporation in this state. For this proposition they rely upon the recent cases of Bayshore San. Dist. v. San Mateo County, 48 Cal.App.2d 337 [119 P.2d 752], and Irvine v. Sacramento, etc. Drainage Dist. 49 Cal.App.2d 707 [122 P.2d 320].…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Georgia v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- WD Haden Company v. DodgenTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.