Legal Opinion
Zipp v. Geske & Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 9, 1997No. 95-3272PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This case is a companion ease to Geske & Sons, Inc. v. NLRB, 103 F.3d 1366 (7th Cir.1997) (“Geske I”). In this case, Geske & Sons, Inc. (“Geske”) sought an injunction from the district court prohibiting the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) from pursuing unfair labor practice charges against Geske. The district court held that, under the National Labor *1381Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (“NLRA” or “the Act”), it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider Geske’s claims, and therefore dismissed them, Geske now appeals, and we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James Bastek v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Geske & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Lineback Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Printpack, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- American Fair Credit Ass'n v. United Credit National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Smithville Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.