Legal Opinion

James Bastek v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 22, 1998No. 97-6221PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

145 F.3d 90

James BASTEK, Russell Kowal, Christopher Pawelski, and

Michael Pillmeier, on behalf of themselves and all

others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION and Dan Glickman, solely

in his capacity as Secretary of Agriculture,

Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 97-6221.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 29, 1998.

Decided May 22, 1998.

Martin R. Gold, Gold, Farrell & Marks, New York City (Robert P. Mulvey, Debra A. Mayer, of counsel), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Irene Chang, Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District of New…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Giuli Ivanishvili v. United States Department of Justice & Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Athanasios Theodoropoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Beharry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Edwin F. Fernandez v. Michael Chertoff, 1 Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Docket No. 05-0426-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Beharry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API