Legal Opinion
Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Smithville Telephone Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 29, 1998No. IP 98-0593-C M/SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McKINNEY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motions filed by the defendants challenging the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the claims raised in the plaintiffs case. On September 10, 1998, defendant Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“IURC” or “Commission”), and five commissioners of the IURC (collectively the “State Defendants”), filed them motion arguing alternatively that:
1. The IURC’s decision regarding the plaintiffs arbitration petitions was an interim decision, and not a final one under 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(6), which means the Court has no subject…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- ROEDEL-HANSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Environamics Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003