Legal Opinion

Peppin v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The defendant’s railroad runs parallel with Canal street and with the Amoskeag mills. The mills are on the west of the railroad and Canal street on the east. To enter the mills it is therefore necessary to cross the tracks. These tracks are two in number, one for the north bound and one for the south bound trains. Middle street enters Canal street from the east.

At the close of work on January 14, the plaintiff left the mill and walked across the tracks to the sidewalk on the northwest corner of Canal and Middle streets, where she expected to meet her husband. She failed to find him, however,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Collette v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Burke v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  5. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Lynch v. L. B. Sprague, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  4. Katsikas v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  5. Kelley v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API