Legal Opinion

Jones v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 7, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The plaintiff’s claims of negligence may be summarized as follows: (1) failure to provide an automatic signal at the crossing; (2) excessive speed of the train; (3) the conduct of the engineer, (a) in failing to give a warning signal after he saw the truck, (b) in failing to use sand when the emergency brake was applied.

In plaintiff’s brief a further suggestion is made that it might be found that the brakes were not applied at all until after the collision took place. The only evidence referred to as tending to sustain this claim is that of a passenger in one of the cars who testified that he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Karr v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. Gagnon v. CraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Banchs v. Humberto ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API