Legal Opinion

Morris v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1931PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

Accepting the plaintiff’s statement of the facts as true, it is clear that the collision would not have occurred if he had not stopped his car in the way of the oncoming train. If he is bound by his testimony, and if it conclusively appears therefrom that he was negligent in the placement of the car in the way of the train, the negligence of the defendant’s servants prior to his act in bringing the car to a stop is immaterial.

One of the vital facts in issue between the parties at the trial was whether the automobile was in motion or at rest when struck by the locomotive. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harlow v. LeclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Carney v. Concord Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  4. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  5. Collette v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alamo v. Del RosarioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Miller v. DanielsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Peppin v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  5. MacKelvie v. RiceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API