Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The deceased was killed and Miss Smith was injured while walking on the track of the defendant near Rockingham Junction at about quarter before seven in the evening. At this point the two main-line tracks run north and south, but the easterly track is known as the east-bound, and the other as the west-bound. These tracks are crossed at the junction by the defendant’s fine from Concord to Portsmouth, and the station building is located north and west of this intersection. The deceased and Miss Smith were struck from the rear by a portion of a freight train backing southerly on the east-bound…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  2. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Garland v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  4. Prescott v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  5. Collette v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Howard v. Mt. Sinai Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. Adams v. SeveranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  5. Hebert v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API