Stocker v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
It is not a matter of law that the train’s speed was inexcessive. While the crossing was private, the defendant maintained it as public. Thus holding it out, it might not say to travelers assuming and relying on it as public that its duties to them were to be otherwise measured. Considering the lack of special protection at the crossing, the usual extent and character of use of the crossing by the public on Sunday afternoons, and such limitations of visible notice of an approaching train as might be found, even assuming the statutory signals by whistle and bell were given, it might reasonably…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gage v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Collins v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- White Mountain Freezer Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
- Saucier v. New Hampshire Spinning MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
- Dame v. Laconia Car Co. WorksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Albertson v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Goldsberry v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.