State ex rel. Grandview Hospital & Medical Center v. Gorman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The court of appeals determined that Grandview’s complaint failed to state a claim in prohibition upon which relief could be granted. Grandview did not set forth facts showing that the common pleas court lacked jurisdiction in this situation. We agree and hold that a trial court, in the course of regulating discovery, has authority to direct an in camera inspection of hospital records despite claims of the medical review committee privilege under R.C. 2305.251.
“For a writ of prohibition to issue, a relator must ordinarily establish: (1) that the court against whom it is sought is about to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Largent v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Carr v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Abner v. ElliottOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wooten v. Westfield InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.