Legal Opinion

Scroggins v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 17, 1950No. 4-9196PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

The question here is whether Ordinance 8163 of the City of Little Eock may by referendum petition filed under the Arkansas Constitution, Amendment VII, be submitted to vote of the people at a special election. Ordinance 8163 authorizes execution of a “cooperation agreement” between the City and the federal Public Housing Administration (hereinafter called P.H.A.) for the construction of certain low-rent housing projects in Little Eock. After referendum petitions were filed, the City Council concluded on advice of counsel that the Constitution did not authorize a referendum on this ordinance,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kleiber v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Campbell v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Langdon v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of North Little Rock v. GormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Gregg v. HartwickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Carson v. OxenhandlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Sanders v. County of SebastianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Wennerstrom v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API