Legal Opinion
Carson v. Oxenhandler
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 1960No. 30545PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs, legal voters in St. Louis County, seek through mandamus to compel the defendants, members of the Board of Election Commissioners of that county, to submit to a referendum election an ordinance enacted by the St. Louis County Council. The trial court denied the writ, and plaintiffs appealed.
This case is a sequel to that of Schmoll v. Housing Authority of St. Louis County, Mo., 321 S.W.2d 494, decided by the Supreme County on February 9, 1959. In that case the Supreme Court held that because of the explicit provision of the charter of St. Louis County…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Housing Authority v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- BCI Corp. v. Charlebois Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Morrow v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- City of Aurora v. ZwerdlingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Powers v. DonohueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Whittington v. StrahmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.