Legal Opinion

Keigley v. Bench, City Recorder

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1939No. 6061PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Plaintiffs are petitioners for a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition in aid thereof to compel the defendant to issue “petition copies” of a referendum petition and to do all other ministerial acts provided for by statute, for the purpose of referring to the voters of Provo City an ordinance passed by the Board of Commissioners of said city on the 5th day of August, 1938, .making certain changes in an ordinance approved by the voters of Provo City October 13, 1936, at a special election held pursuant to the initiative and referendum statutes of the state, authorizing…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hodges v. DawdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Shapiro v. Essex Cty. Freeholders Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Life of the Land v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Scull v. Montgomery Citizens LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. CUPROWSKI v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API