Legal Opinion
Wennerstrom v. City of Mesa
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1991No. CV-91-0068-APPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Marilynn Wennerstrom (plaintiff) sought to compel the City of Mesa (City) and the Mesa City Clerk (Clerk) to continue processing several referendum petitions. She appeals the trial court’s denial of her request. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. §§ 19-122(C) and 19-121.03.1
FACTS
On March 9, 1987, the Mesa City Council (Council) passed a resolution calling for a bond election. At that election, held on April 28, 1987, the Mesa electorate ap*487proved the City’s request for authorization to issue and sell $30 million…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Wheelright v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Citizens for Financially Responsible Government v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Town of Whitehall v. PreeceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Galati v. Lake Havasu CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Redelsperger v. City of AvondaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.