Legal Opinion

Campbell v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1925PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The question involved in the assignments of error centers around the validity, or invalidity, of the special election amending the city charter and authorizing the issuance of the municipal bonds. The position of plaintiff is that the special election was not authorized by law in that the ordinance calling the same, passed June 11, 1924, could not take effect prior to thirty days after its enactment and, therefore, was not in effect when the election was held on July 2, 1924.

The case hinges upon this point.

It is conceded that prior to the calling of the special election, the City of Eugene…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hawke v. Smith (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Long v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Kiernan v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1910

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API