Legal Opinion

Kleiber v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1941No. S. F. 16487PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff, a tax-payer of the city and county of San Francisco, sought an injunction against the city, its board of supervisors, the housing authority of the city and its members, to prevent the performance of the provisions of certain contracts entered into pursuant to the Housing Authorities Law, and to have such contracts declared void. The court found for the defendants and entered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff appealed.

In support of the appeal it is contended that the trial court erroneously found and concluded that the contracts were in accordance with law and therefore valid.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brazell v. Zeigler, County ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Humphrey v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Housing Authority v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API