State v. Musumeci
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
In the middle of a criminal trial charging the defendant, Robert Musumeci (Musume-ci), with illegal possession of marijuana, a Superior Court justice denied Musumeci’s dismissal motion but granted his motion for a mistrial because of the state’s grossly negligent (albeit nondeliberate) failure to comply in a timely manner with its discovery obligations. Ten months later, a second trial justice dismissed the charges against Musu-meci for the same discovery violation that led to the earlier mistrial. The state’s appeal from that adverse judgment requires us to answer…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Swift v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Pastore v. SamsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Lett v. Providence Journal Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.