Legal Opinion

State v. Musumeci

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 4, 1998No. 96-266-C.APublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

In the middle of a criminal trial charging the defendant, Robert Musumeci (Musume-ci), with illegal possession of marijuana, a Superior Court justice denied Musumeci’s dismissal motion but granted his motion for a mistrial because of the state’s grossly negligent (albeit nondeliberate) failure to comply in a timely manner with its discovery obligations. Ten months later, a second trial justice dismissed the charges against Musu-meci for the same discovery violation that led to the earlier mistrial. The state’s appeal from that adverse judgment requires us to answer…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Swift v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. Pastore v. SamsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  3. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  4. Lett v. Providence Journal Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API