Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Hallock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1940No. Nos. 110—112, 183, and 399PublishedCited by 951 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

These cases raise the same question, namely, whether transfers of property inter vivos made in trust, the particulars of which will later appear, are within the provisions of § 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1926.1 They *110were heard in succession and may be decided together. In each case the Commissioner of Internal Revenue' included the trust property in the decedent’s gross estate. In Nos. 110, 111 and 112 his determination was reversed by the Board of Tax Appeals, 34 B. T. A. 575, and the Board was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 102 F. 2d 1. In No. 183, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. May v. HeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Klein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by951 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

946 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API