Legal Opinion
Bushnell Plaza Development Corp. v. Fazzano
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 11, 1983No. FILE No. 1203PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpada, J.
The plaintiff landlord brought this action for unpaid rent and for attorney’s fees. The defendant tenant filed several special defenses, essentially alleg ing uninhabitability, and a counterclaim for damages resulting from the plaintiffs breach of its covenant to repair. The trial court found for the plaintiff on the issue of unpaid rent but rejected its claim for attorney’s fees. The defendant was awarded $20 on his counterclaim. Both parties have appealed from the judgment.
Three issues are raised by this appeal: (1) whether the facts support the court’s conclusion of a month to month…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Welk v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Lundberg v. KovacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Flagg Energy Development Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Van SickleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Arch Ins. Co. v. Centerplan Constr. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Alarmax Distributors, Inc. v. New Canaan Alarm Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.