Legal Opinion
Flagg Energy Development Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 17, 1998No. SC 15611PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*129 Opinion
PETERS, J.
General Statutes § 42a-2-725,1 the statute of limitations contained in article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, establishes a four year time frame within which a buyer may bring a damages action for the sale of allegedly defective goods. Section 42a-2-725 (2) further specifies that a cause of action for breach of warranty accrues upon tender of delivery of the contract goods. The principal issue in this case is the applicability of § 42a-2-725 to a contract for the sale of goods in which the seller agrees not only to deliver the goods but also to perform testing of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- John Martin Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Trans-Spec Truck Service, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.