Legal Opinion

Paul v. Connersville & Newcastle Junction Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

This was an action by the appellant against the appellees. There were two paragraphs in the complaint. The first alleges, that the plaintiff is the owner of a certain tract of land therein described, situate in the county of Henry, upon which the defendant’s road is laid out and located; that the defendant, with men, horses, wagons and other vehicles, has entered upon said land, and is cutting, digging and excavating the earth, and throwing up levees, etc., with the avowed purpose of making and constructing her railroad over and upon said land; that the defendant has never presented to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Johnston v. GlancyIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Underhill v. Saratoga & Washington Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Hunt v. BeesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Heaston v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis R. R. v. OylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Porter v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Burrow v. Terre Haute & Logansport RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hodgson v. JeffriesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Higbee v. RodemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API