Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Beeson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from the Randolph'Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWobden, J.

This was an action by Hunt against Beeson to recover possession of lot number 4, in square number 1, in the town of Huntsville. Trial; finding and judgment for the defendant.

It appears that in 1834 the plaintiff laid out the town of Huntsville, upon his own land, and caused the plat thereof to be duly recorded. The lot in question was marked on the recorded plat as follows: “James Pugh’s tan-yard lot.” In the notes and references to the plat, and recorded with it, is the following explanatory statement: “Lot Ho. 4, in square hTo. 1, is donated by Miles Hunt, Jr., to James Pugh, for the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Farnham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. CoburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Board of Com'rs v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  4. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API