Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1886No. 12,416PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtEliaott, J.

There are three paragraphs of the appellant’s complaint, and although they differ in the relief sought, the gravamen of each of the causes of action is the same: The essential facts in each of the paragraphs are that the appellant is the owner in fee of the real estate described, that the appellee unlawfully asserts a right to the possession of the property, and has wrongfully invaded the appellant’s rights. The affirmative paragraph of the appellee’s answer alleges that it is an incorporated railway company; that in •the construction of its road, it became necessary to take pos*434session of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Lafayette v. NagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Robinson v. ThrailkillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Porter v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Vaught v. PettyjohnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API