Legal Opinion

Higbee v. Rodeman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1891No. 15,187PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J. —

The motion made to dismiss the appeal for want of notice to some of the parties to the judgment is overruled. The cause having been submitted by agreement of parties long prior to the filing of the motion, all question as to the parties to the appeal is waived. First National Bank v. Essex, 84 Ind. 144; Truman v. Scott, 72 Ind. 258; People’s Savings Bank v. Finney, 63 Ind. 460; Ridenour v. Beekman, 68 Ind. 236.

This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant to quiet the title to a tract of land.

The ruling of the court in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hunt v. BeesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Heaston v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Ridenour v. BeekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Adams v. First Baptist Church of St. CharlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Fall Creek School Township v. ShumanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Brady v. GregoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Martin v. GrutkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API