Legal Opinion

Bragg v. the Dayton Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1942No. 32,957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff’s negligence action resulted in a verdict for her. On defendant’s motion, the court ordered judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

On the morning of December 3, 1938, plaintiff was among the first of a large number of customers who entered defendant’s department store in Minneapolis. While she was hurrying down one of the aisles in the basement part of the store, she came in contact with a “sevenpenny box nail” imbedded, as she claims, in an opening between the ends of where the floor boards joined. The nail…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Dunham v. Hubert W. White, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Hastings v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Pepperling v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Lyon v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Sandstrom v. AAD Temple Building Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Ackerman v. Motor Sales & Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Callahan v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API