Bragg v. the Dayton Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff’s negligence action resulted in a verdict for her. On defendant’s motion, the court ordered judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
On the morning of December 3, 1938, plaintiff was among the first of a large number of customers who entered defendant’s department store in Minneapolis. While she was hurrying down one of the aisles in the basement part of the store, she came in contact with a “sevenpenny box nail” imbedded, as she claims, in an opening between the ends of where the floor boards joined. The nail…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Dunham v. Hubert W. White, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Hastings v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Pepperling v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Lyon v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Sandstrom v. AAD Temple Building Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Ackerman v. Motor Sales & Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Callahan v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950