Legal Opinion

Pepperling v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1937No. Nos. 31,117, 31,118PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Login g, Justice.

The minor plaintiff sought recovery in the municipal court of the city of St. Paul for personal injuries sustained because of the de fendant’s alleged negligence. His father also brought suit in the same court to recover for medical expenses incurred. The actions were consolidated and tried together and verdicts for $250 and $50, respectively, were returned in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals from orders denying its motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts or for new trials. The question presented by this record is whether or not plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McDonald v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Sandal v. TALLMAN OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Callahan v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Wire v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Bragg v. the Dayton CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API