Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Motor Sales & Service Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1944No. 33,655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying his motion for a new trial after the trial court had directed a verdict against him. The action was for damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of a fall in defendant’s bowling establishment on December 30, 1941.

The charge of negligence was based on an allegation that defendant had permitted a liquid substance to be on that part of the approach to the alley upon which plaintiff approached his run preliminary to throwing his ball. Plaintiff was right-handed, so he wore a rubber-soled shoe on his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SaporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Filipowicz v. S. S. Kresge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Penny v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Reiher v. MandernackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. McGillivray v. EramianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Diker v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Gutoski v. HermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Harden Ex Rel. Harden v. Seventh Rib, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API