Legal Opinion
Heller v. CACL Federal Credit Union
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-2870PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAHN, District Judge.
The defendants in this case, CACL Federal Credit Union [“CACL”] and the National Credit Union Administration [“NCUA”], have moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, 1 or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2 For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that it is without subject matter jurisdiction to consider the plaintiffs complaint. The case is therefore dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1).
1. Factual Background
The defendant CACL is a federally chartered and insured credit union located…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clifton Smith v. Dearborn Financial Services, Inc., and Dearborn Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Lewis v. JC Penney Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Fucci v. Graduate HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Anserphone, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Grand Union Mount Kisco Employees Federal Credit Union v. KanarykDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.