Legal Opinion
Anserphone, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1301PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, this Court will grant defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.
I. Background
A Procedural history
Plaintiff brought this action against defendants, Bell Atlantic Corporation (Bell Atlantic) and its subsidiary, Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania (Bell-PA), by filing a Praecipe for Writ of Summons in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, on July 16, 1993. 1 After plaintiff filed its complaint alleging that defendants…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christy Sports, LLC v. Deer Valley Resort Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- America v. PrestonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Novinger Group, Inc. v. Hartford Ins., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Covad Communications Co. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.